Decision in process after with editor springer reddit. The status have been "With editor" since a month.
Decision in process after with editor springer reddit. She was the most wonderful dog, and we miss her so much.
- Decision in process after with editor springer reddit 18th of July, the status is showing “Editor assigned. I haven't Thank you for the information Profs. " This is also a place to talk about your own psychology research, methods, and career in order to gain input from our vast psychology community. If you still My manuscript status shows "With Editor" after initial submission. Even within Springer publications, the process flow may vary slightly depending It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal 5 weeks ago. Springer Nature has a huge portfolio of journals, so I’m not going to dispute that the name can be misleading to a lay audience, but beyond that, is the content really that bad? I’ve read and used plenty of useful stuff that was published in SR, and it doesn’t seem to deserve all the hate it gets (based on my experience anyway). “Decision in Process” is also a way for the handling editor to communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision on the manuscript. My understanding is that the editor has made the decision based on the reviews, but they have now passed the decision to the editor-in-chief. Cite This happened to me with one ElsevIer Journal, while I received only I have the same issues with Springer right now. However, since it's been only a week since submission, I doubt that the paper has been through peer review. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to Hello! I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal 6 months ago. LNBIP, vol. Your submission is now with the Associate Editor for recommendation, and will then go to the Senior Associate Editor and EiC for further recommendation and decision. The status “With editor” About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Sometimes this can take few weeks for various personal reasons (for example heavy work load on the editor). In the former stage, when a manuscript is submitted and come into the editorial system—the Springer calls it the ‘Editorial Manager’—the editor-in-chief is to check the similarity score and other related matters—a sort of checking point for possible academic Hello! My coauthor and I submitted a paper to one of Springer's journals at the end of August. Reply reply The home of all things X-Men on reddit, be it comic books, film, television, gaming or any other medium that Marvel's mutants have What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? What does a status change from from "with editor" to "under review" mean for a Springer journal? 6. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. Also, a Rejection was received and was reasoned by that the revision was not feasible, according to the recommendations of the previous reviewers. It took five days for getting the "Editor assigned" status after my submission and still The discussions in this reddit should be of an academic nature, and should avoid "pop psychology. It did not go for peer review. The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor may ask the publisher via their in-house contact for advice on difficult or complicated cases. Again, I made the required edits in order to make The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make The peer reviewers will provide an assessment of your manuscript, but ultimately the decision to accept or reject your manuscript for publication is made, not by the peer reviewers, but by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal [1, 5, 18,19,20]. Most recent answer. Conforming is the process of then taking the raw files and "conforming When you think a manuscript might be eligible for transfer, you can choose the decision ‘Decline and Transfer to Transfer Desk’ to offer the authors a transfer. The time taken for the different stages in the submission process varies across journals, but it is quite normal for the status to show “With editor” for over a month Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that It is not possible to put a definitive timescale on when an article will be published as there are many aspects in the process which are unpredictable. At the fist time, the handling editor required to revise the manuscript. 2 Weeks after getting my manuscript number. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned At this point, the editor takes a decision after reading to either invite reviewers for review or reject if he is not convinced the content will attract the potential readers/researchers. It does not necessarily imply rejection, so you need not lose Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status changed immediatly to "Review Completed" and then to "Decision in Process". g. The complainant will be given appropriate feedback. After a few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the status changed to all essential reviews are complete and presently the status is final decision awaited. The research found out that out of the total 1487 reddits 9. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Chapter Google Scholar In this series of posts, an experienced journal editor tells us more about the editorial structure of a journal as well as its evaluation and decision-making processes. However, in a very rapid decision from the associate editor, the status was turned from With editor to Decision in Process in the same day of submission. Share. Then, two weeks later it switched back to "passed technical checks, now If rejected after review you should get detailed comments. Hello. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned My only thought is that the editor wanted to send to more reviewers initially, but they couldn't respond in a timely way, so the editor gave you a chance to revise after the initial reviews. In this case, the initial "With Editor" status probably appeared when the Editor-in-chief or Editorial Assistants had a look at the manuscript to check if the basic journal requirements were in place and assign the manuscript id. The authors will receive your decision email with a link they can click to either accept or decline the transfer offer. Top 2% Rank by size . And most of our models can be viewed as a variant of this model. The status said "reviews completed" (2 reviewers sent their reports). I've done a bunch of reading on various breeds, and Springers keep rising to the top of my list, for a The below procedure applies to appeals to editorial decisions, complaints about failure of processes such as long delays in handling papers and complaints about publication ethics. In cases where it goes from “with editor” directly to “decision in process”, this may As a general rule, Springer is not very quick. Need Advice Maybe sent the editor a friendly email (bonus points if you can get your professor to do it). Even after that happens, some journals leave the final decision to accept up to the editorial I submitted a manuscript to a journal on September. 5 years and can confirm that every article accepted for a journal was copy edited and proofread before it published. the editor of the first journal consulted with the editor of the second and in their response letter they said if we transferred it would go out immediately for review. In the coming week or two you should probably expect a decision from the journal about whether the manuscript will be considered by the editor and the peer reviewers or whether they I was talking to the editor we're hiring for our 48 Hour Film Fest this summer and he suggested hiring a conformer as well. Good luck! Related reading: After three rounds of review and revision, why is the status "with editor" again? Sixteen former guests of The Jerry Springer Show, who were interviewed on various U. S. Revise and resubmit mean that the editor sees clear solutions and ways to address the problems brought up by the reviewers. the review process with this journal has formally ended. We will endeavour to get a decision to you as soon as we can and assure you we are keeping our eye on the progress of your manuscript. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months. I had e-mailed the journal manager enquiring about the "with editor " status. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. Final decision can be : rejection, acceptance with revision ( minor changes, or major changes) or acceptance without revision. Normally, a direct change from "With editor" to "Decision in process" implies a desk rejection. ADMIN MOD "Editor Invited" status on submitted manuscript . In that case, what it means is that if you don't get a decision in a week (7 days) you will likely need to wait a while for that From my point of view, one month is enough for the first decision, 2-3 months are OK for the review process, then one month for the final decision after revision. The submission status has not changed since the last 3 weeks. Elsevier and Springer both usually take 6 weeks. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. 21% of them were positive reddits 83. In fact, free-lance editing of academic prose is definitely a side-gig (or sometimes main gig) for many editor-academics. " Reply reply The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. The academic editor was a reputed researcher. If the decision is not to send the manuscript for review, the Editor-in-Chief contacts the author with the decision. Editors rely upon the reviewers to get outside expert perspectives about the relevance and quality of the paper, especially if it is Generally I have a positive experience with Inderscience Publishers. More posts you may like /r/h3h3productions is the home of the H3 Podcast on reddit! This So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. The good news is that the comments were mainly suggestions for the lit review, offering citations to add and incorporate to strengthen the article. The status of my article is listed as "With editor. Then, (after two weeks) it takes "Editor invited". It may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e. It is almost certainly not worth going back to the Editor, as they will only ever consider reversing a decision if the review comments contain significant, factual errors. 2. 198–211. Again, I made the required edits in order to make In my experience, the timeline for pending decisions varies significantly by journal and editor. The main status says under review. A direct change to Decision Under Process (sometimes, also called Decision in Process) after With Editor means that the editor has had a look at the paper and arrived at a decision on the paper, which is to not send it for peer review. Normally “editor invited” comes after manuscript screening. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers This status implies that the referee have submitted his/her report. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned In other words, the editor does not make the decision whether or not to publish your manuscript; instead, the editor depends upon the evaluation and the decision, (1), (2), or (3) above, arrived I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. This could mean a desk rejection, because the paper does not fit with the aim/scope of the journal, may not be novel enough, At this stage, when the journal decision is in process, the editor will review the revised manuscript and your responses to the reviewers’ comments before making a decision. media outlets such as the entertainment news program Extra, Rolling Stone magazine, and The New York Post newspaper, even claimed there was a "fight quota" for each episode and that they and other guests were encouraged to fight one another. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. . On the other hand, if the status changes to “Decision in process,” it implies that the Editor is making the decision on your paper. My MS apparently did not undergo peer-review. They promised that the review process will be expedited as it's unusual for a manuscript to have a "with editor" status for two weeks. Does this imply a Reject decision? "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. After that they just used her holo to contact you and kill you too. So don't feel upset! "Editor decision started" might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but that's not necessarily the case. Systems don't always flag up to editors when papers have been sitting there, or automatic emails get lost in the shuffle. I find it strange that reviewers have already been selected and that reviews have already Reddit. Me using 50 % of the resources of this country's top academic computational grid to keep trying and failing to run a basic python script because I'm not good with computer but I want a cool protein structure prediction figures but these packages are not compatible why why is it not working We evaluate this approach by implementation, semantic comparison of the decision taking process before and after approach application, and an empirical analysis of industry process models. Otherwise I will be in touch in the near future. I am a native speaker (and, I must say, also a strong writer) and still paid an independent editor to go over my first book before I submitted the manuscript. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. All authors, editors, and reviewers are expected to reply to journal queries in a timely manner, and to comply with PLOS’ Code of Conduct for Editorial Board Members and our policies on Ethical Peer Review and Standards for Professional Conduct . After watching this video series, you will learn the concept and properties of discrete-time Markov decision process. Researchers found that the volume of reviews has a greater influence on sales of experience products, I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The manuscript had the With Editor status for about 4 months. I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a When the status changed to “Decision in Process”, it meant that based on the peer review, the handling editor had made a decision on the manuscript. Despite the fact that isn't a leading publisher (as Springer, Emerald, Elsevier or MDPI), it has a relatively high standard of After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your "Dear Editor, Thanks so much for this offer. You have not mentioned whether your paper has been through any other status before this. , Song, M. Closing date 6 Sep 2024. time taken to review The Editor-in-Chief together with the Handling Editor (where appropriate) and/or in-house contact (where appropriate) will investigate the matter. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal a few months I submitted to a springer journal, the day after the status changed to “editor assigned”, and it stayed like that for 3 weeks. e. Does it mean that the manuscript will be sent again for another The gold open access route should have no bearing on how long the review process takes. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that The "Editor invited" status stayed since the submission, and then it changed to "Decision in Process" directly. Worrying will change nothing. Complaint about processes, e. Easy process for everyone. Reviewers have commented and completed their review on March 19. I had submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 29th may 2019. Personally I would wait another week or so, but yeah it is annoying to wait Reply reply More replies More replies. Usually the decision letter came quickly - in 3 days. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. (eds. When a paper Once the editor has accepted the invitation, the manuscript status will change to “Editor assigned. Imagine being a conscientious referee and having a to-do list of reviews which means you book in some time to do the review at 5 1/2 months, and then you get bugged by the editor just before you plan to start. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. If it gets rejected, you will get comments on why it was rejected and must change your paper accordingly. Prior research showed evidence that customer reviews affect consumer buying behavior [], which ultimately impacts sales. I'm working on an article and checking reddit. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. This implies a stretch between the desk decision and the next one about which you would be notified. Finally today, i. This is usually journal-dependent, e. For additional information, please check our peer review policies for Springer, Stage 4: Decision. Most recent answer I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. Rather than attempt to establish a single time frame, I would suggest that you look at a recent Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Editor Only'' he claimed that revision should be quick and it will not undergo the entire review process>>. It seems strange. But I wouldn't bother responding to emails for at least another week because I'm "on holiday. There can be four possible outcomes: Accept; Reject The “manuscript under consideration” is the process of the editor making their case about whether they think the manuscript is worth sending to peer-review. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status It doesn't mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. I'm definitely interested. If the Editor-in-Chief decides the paper is within the Journal's remit, the Reddit. After the 1st round of review one of the reviewers rejected the manuscript and subsequently the paper was rejected by the editor. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would loop back to 4 and 5. For reference, the manuscript was previously sent to a different Springer journal, which uses the old manuscript tracking system, which was a bit more detailed in this sense: Decision Made 8th May 24 Editor Review Started 6th May 24 Initial Manuscript Review Started 3rd May 24 Editor Assigned 1st May 24 Submission 19th Apr 24 I recently submitted a manuscipt. Is that a switch in assigned editors? A memo that the editor downloaded the paper? Even if the decision in process status takes a couple of weeks more, you have nothing to worry about. Lohmann, N. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. My paper is now decision in process for over two weeksa after second revision ( 2 reviewers accept, 1 reviewer major revision). Cool, no problem, people are busy. What could be the scenario? If we have some more revision to do means the editor could've sent us the update to incorporate reviewer comments rite? To update you, two reviews have been returned. The editor may decide to consult the peer reviewers again. Get help with your research I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. [57] The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned 2. Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal in finals/holiday season that is simultaneously trying to catch up on grading before the deadline and I have submitted my research article to Environment, Development and Sustainability (Springer) 3 weeks ago. In my opinion, this status change indicates desk The editor has received the reviews and s/he is in the process of judging them (sometimes maybe s/he will decide on a new review, but not likely) and communicating the decision to you. Cite 4 After about 1 year, it has been still stocked in the stage of "decision in process". Follow answered Apr 29, 2020 When Associate Editor or Handling Editor recommends his decision to Editor (Status: Ready for Decision/With Editor) You will get mail at this stage with subject : Reviews complete and decision Decisions on appeals are final and new submissions take priority over appeals. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. you'll generate an EDL or edit decision list which is a list on timecode that specifies in and out points for all of your edits in the sequence. Estimated timeline STEP #1: Claim Received: Normally takes between 7 and 14 days STEP #2: Under Review: This step typically takes 7 to 21 days STEP #3: Gathering of Evidence: This step is the longest phase in the VA claim process and usually takes 30-60 days STEP #4: Review of Evidence: Takes 7 to 14 days on average STEP #5: Preparation for Decision: This step The below procedure applies to appeals to editorial decisions, complaints about failure of processes such as long delays in handling papers and complaints about publication ethics. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. Later, My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. Improve this answer. Or check it out in the app stores Home with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. Editors are often busy. An appeal letter includes some critical components to have an impact on the editor’s final decision Employer Springer Nature Ltd Location New York City, New York (US) Salary Associate Editor $74,000 - Senior Editor $91,000. Then your status would shift to If the status of the manuscript shifted after the peer review to “with editor” or “editor assigned,” it means that the manuscript was returned to the Associate Editor, who will peruse The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. 86% of were neutral reddits 6. The editor asked us to resubmit the manuscript. The Editor will contact you directly with the editorial decision, Editor comments, and reviewer comments. It is possible. More than that you may email him I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Although each journal provides a description of submission statuses on their site, these statuses are not always easy to decipher. , reject or send to reviewers) has not yet been made? Should I send the editor an email asking if an initial decision has yet been made? On average, according to data provided in Springer Journal Finder, on average, it would take 85 days for the first decision in Water Resources Management and 62 days for the first decision in the " Decision in Process " after a Minor Revision . Overall, things sound positive, and you should receive the decision soon. I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a At least it is good to pass initial screening stage and reach at selecton of reviewers. Dear Editor, Recently, the status of my revised manuscript in a Springer journal changed as follows: 09 Nov: Submitted to the Journal 11 Nov: under review 03 Dec: under review 05 Dec: Required reviews completed 11 Dec: Decision in process 12 Dec: With Editor. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Certainly, you will get something important to improve the quality of your paper. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers I submitted a manuscript in a journal (Springer) and after 3 days the status of my MS changed to "With the Editor" followed by "Decision in Process" after 5 days. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the Now imagine that it's an editor of a major journal who has many articles to work through. If it goes longer that's a good sign because it's probably gone to a sub editor with more expertise in the field. I expect that very soon you will receive the answer. In my case, I got this status two times. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. If this is the case, the decision could be delayed by another couple of weeks. Stage 2: Editor assigned. 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. In the context of the journal review process, the status "Decision Rescinded" typically indicates that a previous decision made on a manuscript has been reversed or withdrawn by the editor or journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Is there a reason you are trying to have this done independently? Copy editing and proof reading is built into the production process for any major academic publisher. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to 1-Casual phone interview (30 min, why you want to be editor, they tell you about the interview process) 2-Task (first time I interviewed it was a 2h task reviewing two manuscripts, second time it was a written assessment with your opinions about a published paper) 3- 2-3h interview, first a written task (similar to the previous, review a manuscript in a 30 min then comment it with Overall, it has two different stages of editorial procedures: the initial process stage and the review process stage. The article went to chief editor on March 25. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal about 3 weeks ago. We didn't receive the comments yet. If you're asking why "with editor" didn't show up, there's a good chance it did, but the editor made a decision in a few minutes and you didn't notice it. Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. Subsequently, the date of the status changed to 13th July while the status remained the same. The handling editor then looks into it and make the next step: revise/final decision/reject. The journal is an Elsevier publication that shows a time The "Editor invited" status stayed for two weeks, and then it changed to "Decision in Process" directly. Since then the status did not change. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. Springer's tracking system showed "Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor’s decision" after a major revision on December 26th. Arenas. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Then the status date updated, but the status remained “editor assigned”. Possibly field/journal specific, but I would consider an extra 3 months to be enough time to warrant a follow up. The editor sent me the comments of this reviewer with a decision of "Acceptable after major revision and re-evaluation". ” The assigned editor can now take a call on whether to send your manuscript for peer review. The editors make decisions on submissions based on scientific rigor, regardless of novelty. For the first I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. The pause in time does not always mean a rejection in underway. ) Overall, it has two different stages of editorial procedures: the initial process stage and the review process stage. Editors rely upon the reviewers to get outside expert perspectives about the relevance and quality of the paper, especially if it is The status first showed that it is "With Editor" and then it changed to "Decision in Process" without going through any review process. How long this stage normally takes? is it too early to ask the The process includes the steps : editor , reviewer , and final decision . I was a journal production editor at Taylor and Francis for ~2. If they accept, it will go out for review. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. FWIW, I’ve not seen reject and resubmits converted to publications on any articles that I’ve reviewed where the editor has given authors that decision. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, The peer reviewers will provide an assessment of your manuscript, but ultimately the decision to accept or reject your manuscript for publication is made, not by the peer reviewers, but by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal [1, 5, 18,19,20]. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a I submitted a manuscript in a journal (Springer) and after 3 days the status of my MS changed to "With the Editor" followed by "Decision in Process" after 5 days. The Elsevier website say "If the Editor has registered a decision in the system but has not yet sent you the email confirming the decision, the status of your article will be listed as ‘Decision in Process’. Even if the initial reviewers are found quickly and complete their reviews on time (minimum 2-3 months), they might not be conclusive for the editor, so another reviewer will be solicited, adding at least two more months before a decision is made. We have had correspondences with the editorial board of the journal, but no responses received from them up to It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. I submitted a manuscript to the journal then the status changed to With Editor After a certain period it was changed to the decision in the process. The change of status directly to “decision in process” from "editor invited" could indicate a desk rejection. Open access simply means that the article is freely available to everyone if its accepted and published. For example, although we try to limit the review period as much as possible we are highly de I think publishing a springer book is fine when you are defining a career trajectory and just want a publisher to enter your decision into the public record, but frankly I just don’t think the people who publish Springer books really try that hard at crafting the student’s mind; Just isn’t a top priority for the authors or the editors. The complaint should in first instance be handled by the Editor-in-Chief(s) responsible for the journal and/or the Editor who handled the paper. Why is “Decision in process” means one editor has made a recommendation, but another editor needs to approve it. My manuscript prospectus is being reviewed by other presses at the moment and so will need some time to finalize my decision. After that we sent a rebuttal letter to editor. If you have a specific hard deadline by which you will need a decision, please let me know. She was the most wonderful dog, and we miss her so much. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor follows guidelines published by the Committee on Publication Ethics. It is possible that this journal sends out invitations to the editor as soon as a manuscript is submitted, and an admin person conducts the manuscript screening while waiting for the editor to accept the invitation. If you think the comments are wrong, go to another journal and try again. Till date it says "decision in process". 1 Product Reviews. Videos you "Trimmed" can potentially revert back to their "Un-Trimmed" state at any time without your knowledge. Most of modern reinforcement learning algorithms are developed based on this model. I just had a paper transferred after a desk reject to a sister journal. " As per the normal journal processes, the editor first conducts an initial screening of the manuscript. (There was a lot riding on it. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable We've been looking at getting a dog after sadly losing our boxer to a tumor (she was almost 10 years old) last Christmas. 171, pp. Attempting to "look-up" a solution or any news about this issue comes up with absolutely nothing that seems like an actual *fix* unfortunately. It is common for the peer review status of a manuscript to change several times before a final decision is reached by the editor. "Dear Editor, Thanks so much for this offer. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor decides on a course of action and provides feedback to the No it doesn’t make a difference, and it’s faster and more direct. And at the second time, the status changed to "decision in process". @Ijaz Durrani and @Jorge P. You have the option to choose paperweight, color/black-white option, etc. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Those mercenaries were on job for Biotechnica, I assume Nele Springer got killed right after you exited her car in dogtown. Going back from the start of this story, some "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. The status have been "With editor" since a month. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. 92% of them were Ironically, recently I was able to use PDF file (nOt PiRaTed aT aLL) of a Springer-published book and print-on-demand it, the copy came out with great quality for about 1/5 of Springer price, I bet it would be way better than a genuine copy from Springer if I bought it now. Right now, the editor is deciding whether to send your manuscript for review or not, which can take up to two months if the editor goes on vacation. Even within Springer publications, the process flow may vary slightly depending on the journal. , Wohed, P. If a journal offers both (open access & traditional 'closed' options) then they'll go through the same editorial and review process. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). After subsequent changes in the status, finally it showed “Reviews completed” on 5th of July. " Does this mean an initial editorial decision (i. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. This series sheds light on the factors that are at play during manuscript publication, how editorial decisions are made, and what the sequence of events in the publication I've had this re-occurring problem about 2-4 times now, the 4th time being today. Two days ago Reddit. ) BPM 2013 Workshops. Or check it out in the app stores Springer is just the publisher so it is difficult to know just based on that - but congrats anyways! There are some exceptions in the case of special volumes but it’s usually the case of an editor inviting a renown scholar to write a I sent a submission to an Elsevier Journal. Please what means ''with editor''. ” What does this mean? I have done a submission to other journal some months before and the "with editor" process was just a week. Yeah, "ghost reviewers" (those that accept and then disappear) are a pain for editors. My MS apparently Ignore it until you receive the decision via email. In the former stage, when a manuscript is submitted and come into the editorial system—the Springer calls it the ‘Editorial Manager’—the editor-in-chief is to check the similarity score and other related matters—a sort of checking point for possible academic 631K subscribers in the labrats community. And it will be the The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. I sent a submission to an Elsevier Journal. Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Sometimes, the editor needs to take the help of the editorial board to come to a decision if he or she is unsure about a paper. After 5 weeks it's now decision in This paper performs sentiment analysis on Reddit posts related to vaccines using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques like stopwords, spacytextblob, wordcloud, subjectivity and polarity. Does this mean rejection? it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. The timeline went from Editor invited (is editor a subject or a direct object?) on September 2 to reviews received (not reviewers received) on September 12 (see pic here). After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it It's fine. If the manuscript passes this screening, it is sent for peer review . Multiple studies have been done on knowing the effects of product reviews on the sales of the product [8,9,10,11]. I would wait until after the advertised time has passed, and leave a margin: (so if it were six months, wait until the seven month mark. My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. I'm in sciences, so a different set of publication norms, but for me, a polite note to the editor would be entirely reasonable. kzcim wmwjuc uvlcvu jorjd jph iinbxn ane ayceb nryt vro